Language Snapshots

Kanauji (Uttar Pradesh, India) – Language Snapshot

Author
  • Anu Pandey orcid logo (Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur)

Abstract

Kanauji is a threatened and low-resourced western-Hindi variety spoken by 7 million people in Kanpur, Farrukhabad, Etawah, Hardoi, Shahjahanpur, Pilibhit, Kanauj, etc., Uttar Pradesh, India. Kanauji native speakers use Kanauji, Hindustani, and Standard Hindi in different social situations or domains, simultaneously switching between the standard dialect 'Standard Hindi' and the vernacular dialects ‘Hindustani or Kanauji’ in language variation patterns. Kanauji speakers maintain their language in rural regions more than in urban centers. Although Kanauji is still prevalent in homes and neighbourhoods, It needs more presence in formal domains such as education, literary works, and media where Hindustani and Standard Hindi are used. The migration of youth towards the city for socio-economic mobility and higher education is causing them to learn and shift towards the ‘Hindustani’ lingua franca and Standard Hindi. Thus, Kanauji is a threatened variety now and needs urgent documentation efforts. There have been ongoing efforts to document the Kanauji language in the last few years. The author’s Ph.D. project starting in 2017, is another step to describe and document the language, social situation, and culture of the Kanauji community. This paper briefly overviews the geographical location, demographics, socio-culture, prior research, and current research on Kanauji.

Keywords: threatened Hindi variety, low-resourced language, snapshot, Kanauji

How to Cite:

Pandey, A., (2024) “Kanauji (Uttar Pradesh, India) – Language Snapshot”, Language Documentation and Description 24(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.25894/ldd.1004

248 Views

102 Downloads

Published on
02 Aug 2024
Peer Reviewed

Language Name: Kanauji (Dehati), Kannauji

Language Family: Indo European > Indo Aryan > Western Hindi > Unclassified

ISO 639-3 Code: bjj

Glottolog Code: kana1281

Population: 7,093,740 (John & Varghese 2021)

Location: Kanpur, Kanauj, Auraiya, Etawah, Farrukhabad, Hardoi, Pilibhit, Mainpuri, and Shahjahanpur districts in Uttar Pradesh, India.

Vitality rating: Endangered (Eberhard et al. 2024)

1. Geography

Kanauji is spoken in the state of Uttar Pradesh in northern India in the districts of Kanauj, Kanpur, Farrukhabad, Hardoi, Auraiya, Etawah, Mainpuri, Shahjahanpur, and Pilibhit (see Figure 1). Kanauji’s territory extends approximately between latitudes 26.5 to 28.5 degrees north and longitudes 70 to 80.5 degrees east. The Kanauji-speaking population is estimated to be around 7,093,740 according to the 2001 census (John & Varghese 2021: 1).

Figure 1: Kanauji-speaking regions of Uttar Pradesh, India. Map by the author.

2. Language Status and Socio-cultural Life

The label Kanauji was coined by Grierson (1968[1916]) in the Linguistic Survey of India. Grierson categorizes the language as belonging to the Western Hindi group along with Bundeli, Braj Bhasha, and Hariyanvi, all varieties of Standard Hindi. According to Tripathi (1977: 22), Kanauji has multiple names referencing the Kanauj district in Uttar Pradesh where it is spoken: Kannauji, Kanauji, and Kanujiya. In the Farrukhabad district, it is called Kanujujiya. Kanauji has three sub-variants: Kanauji Proper, Tirhari, and Transitional Kanauji. The form that is considered “pure” and “proper” is spoken in Kanauj and Farukkhabad.

Most Kanauji speakers identify themselves as speaking Dehati ‘village variety’ (John & Varghese 2021: 11). According to John & Varghese, Kanauji speakers are bilingual in Hindi. Although Kanauji is common in many domains of daily life, a shift toward Standard Hindi is being observed, especially among young and educated speakers. Education has played a primary role in enhancing the Hindi proficiency of Kanauji speakers, improving their ability to speak and read complex materials such as books, newspapers, and magazines in Hindi.

Kumar (2009: 5) explains that in this area spoken Hindi is known as Khariboli, sometimes also called Hindustani. This language emerged as the primary language for communication and lingua franca in North India due to the interaction and blending of different Indian and foreign language speakers. Khariboli was not regarded as a suitable medium for official instructions in feudal courts or for standardized use in creative endeavors, but it began to operate as the oral vernacular for the common people and has become a language of broader communication in the north (Verma 1933).

Standard Hindi and Khariboli have shared a classic diglossic relationship since Indian independence. While Khariboli is used as a lingua franca across northern India, it is Standard Hindi that holds the status of the official and literary language.1 Kanauji speakers prefer the more prestigious Khariboli and Modern Standard Hindi in casual and formal situations, respectively. Since Khariboli is the lingua franca, using it helps Kanauji speakers blend in with urrban Hindi speakers and communicate effectively with speakers of other languages. Standard Hindi is perceived as a pathway to attaining economic gains and higher prestige.

Kanauji is restricted to close-knit settings like households and local communities and is dispreferred in public and formal contexts. The use of Kanauji in public is a marker of lower status, implying rural background, lower economic class, and lack of formal education. Educated youths feel ashamed to use Kanauji in the presence of non-Kanauji speakers, and educated youth often use Kanauji to look down upon or make fun of someone. (Dwivedi & Kar 2016: 110). This suggests they harbor a negative attitude toward their mother tongue. Despite this, when asked if they would if they would like to see Kanauji introduced into formal education settings, rural youth replied that they would (Pandey 2023a). There is evidence that university students use Khariboli in inter and intra-group communication, while they speak Kanauji with their older family members and grandparents.

3. Linguistic Features of Kanauji and Related Varieties

Although the phonology and morphology of Kanauji and Hindi are quite similar, according to Dwivedi & Kar (2018: 206) Kanauji does have some phonological features that are distinct from Hindi. For instance, in Kanauji the palatal and velar nasal phones [ɲ] and [ŋ] are allophones of /n/ and thus do not have a phonemic status like they do in Hindi. Kanauji has processes of fortition, nasalization, vowel insertion, and reduplication when compared to Hindi; for example, Hindi skuːl ‘school’ corresponds to ɪskuːl ‘school’ in Kanauji; Hindi luʈ ‘theft’ is luʈ-laʈ in Kanauji. There are also differences in words ending with ɾ, l, and ɽ. An example is pipəl ‘peepal tree’ in Hindi, which is pronounced pipər ‘peepal tree’ in Kanauji.

Morphological similarities are observed between the Hindi and Kanauji lexicon. Question words are simultaneously inflected for number and gender, e.g., Hindi kɛsɑ and Kanauji kəɪsɑ ‘how.m.sg; Hindi kɪt̪nɑ and Kanauji kɪt̪t̪ɑ ‘how much/many.m.sg’. Full and discontinuous reduplication are observed in both languages’ question words; e.g., Hindi kəbhi-nɑ-kəbhi and Kanauji kəbhəʊ̃-nɑ-kəbhəʊ̃ some time or the other’. Synchronic morphophonological variation in question words was observed between different regional varieties of Kanauji, suggesting a need for more extensive documentation (Pandey 2023b).

4. Existing Literature

Many works briefly discuss the areal distribution and position of Kanauji with respect to Khariboli. These include Shapiro (1989), Masica (1993), and Kachru (2006), among others. There is work on Kanauji folk songs (Santram 1975) and on the sociology of Kanauji literature (Tripathi 1977). Pandey (1978) provides a basic description of the linguistic characteristics of Kanauji, including vowels and consonants, nouns, pronouns, adjectives, and question words; Tripathi (1977) provides a comparative overview of the grammar of the varieties spoken in the lower Ganga plain region. Trivedi (1990) accounts for echo words in Kanauji. Recent work on the linguistic repertoire of Kanpur sheds light on Kanpur as the confluence of several varieties of Hindi (Chaturvedi 2015). Mishra & Bali (2010, 2011) have developed a small-scale NLP application in Kanauji.

Dwivedi & Kar (2016, 2017, 2018) describe the phonology and sociolinguistics of Kanauji of Kanpur. Singh (2016) provides a brief background, wordlist, and grammar of the Kanauji language variety. John & Varghese (2021) give a broad sociolinguistic profile of Kanauji speakers of Uttar Pradesh. Their study outlines the present geographical distribution of the Kanauji language and its relationship with other Western Hindi varieties such as Bundeli, Braj Bhasha, and Hindi. It also documents the level of bilingualism in Kanauji speakers, their attitudes toward the language, and the extent of the language shift toward Hindi.

5. Ongoing Work

The author’s work on Kanauji was begun during PhD studies (2017–2023) at the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. The project endeavored to describe the structure and function of questions and question words in Kanauji and Standard Hindi. Kanauji data was collected primarily from Kanpur district, however, a brief overview of the morpho-phonological variation among different regional varieties of Kanauji was also provided. As the data was mostly collected during COVID-19, remote fieldwork using mobile interviews was adopted. Since most Kanauji speakers exhibit bilingual proficiency in Hindi, elicitation was done via questionnaires prepared in Hindi. Around twenty audio recordings of dialogues were also collected; these were used to create a podcast featuring rituals of the Kanauji language (Pandey 2024). A quantitative sociolinguistic survey with rural school children and college youth in Kanpur studied bilingualism, bidialectalism, and extended diglossia among Kanauji speakers who use Khariboli and Standard Hindi in the overlapping domains of education, media, religion, the household, work, and more. The project represents a step towards bringing recognition to this variety.

Notes

  1. North-Central India is referred to as the “Hindi belt” or the “Khariboli belt”, reflecting differing degrees of diglossic complementation across multiple speech varieties (Khubchandani 1972). Bilingual speakers in the north-central region retain their regional or caste dialects of Western Hindi or use another language for informal communication within their speech group (Khubchandani 1972, 1978). For formal communication, they prefer to use Standard Hindi. [^]

Competing Interests

The author has no competing interests to declare.

References

Chaturvedi, Sujata. 2015. A sociolinguistic study of linguistic variation and code matrix in Kanpur. Proceedings of the Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences 192: 107–115. DOI:  http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.017

Dwivedi, Pankaj & Somdev Kar. 2016. Kanauji of Kanpur: A brief overview. Acta Linguistica Asiatica 6(1): 101–119. DOI:  http://doi.org/10.4312/ala.6.1.101-119

Dwivedi, Pankaj & Somdev Kar. 2017. On documenting low-resourced Indian languages insights from Kanauji speech corpus. Dialectologia: Revista Electrònica 19: 67–91.

Dwivedi, Pankaj & Somdev Kar. 2018. Phonology of Kanauji. In Ghanshyam Sharma (ed.), Advances in Hindi language teaching and applied linguistics, 189–220. Munich, Germany: Lincom Europa.

Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2024. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Twenty-seventh edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com.

Grierson, George A. (1968 [1916]). Linguistic survey of India. Vol IX: Part I. (First Published by Superintendent Government Printing, Calcutta). Reprint Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

John, Mathews & Bezily P. Varghese. 2021. The Kanauji-speaking people of Uttar Pradesh: A sociolinguistic profile. Journal of Language Survey Reports 2021-012: 1–19. SIL International.

Kachru, Yamuna. 2006. Hindi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Khubchandani, Lachman M. 1972. Mother tongue in multilingual societies. In A. Chandra Sekhar (ed.), Economic and socio-cultural dimensions of regionalization, 427–450. New Delhi: The Registrar General India.

Khubchandani, Lachman M. 1978. Toward a selection grammar: Fluidity in modes of address and reference in Hindi-Urdu. Indian Linguistics 39: 1–24.

Kumar, Uday. 2009. Status of Hindi in India. New Delhi: Readworthy Publications.

Masica, Colin P. 1993. The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mishra, Diwakar & Kalika Bali. 2010. Hindi dialects phonological transfer rules for verb root Cǝlǝ. Paper presented at the 13th Oriental Conference in coordination with the International Committee for the Coordination and Standardization of Speech Databases and Assessment Techniques (COCOSDA-2010). Kathmandu, November 2010.

Mishra, Diwakar & Kalika Bali. 2011. A Comparative phonological study of the dialects of Hindi. Paper presented at the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII). Hong Kong, August 2011.

Pandey, Anu. 2023a. Bidialectalism and extended diglossia in Kanauji speakers. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences: Illinois Working Papers 46: 53–81.

Pandey, Anu. 2023b. Morpho-phonology of interrogative pronouns in Kanauji and Hindi. In Ghanshyam Sharma & John J. Lowe (eds.), Advances in South Asian Linguistics, 377–400. Germany: Lincom Europa.

Pandey, Anu. 2024. Podcasts in Kanauji: Assisting language teaching and revitalization. Language Documentation & Conservation 18: 1–19.

Pandey, Preeti. 1978. Kanauji mein sangya pad rachna [Noun word formation in Kanauji]. Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh: University of Lucknow master’s thesis.

Santram, Anil. 1975. Kanauji lok-sahitya [Kanauji folk literature]. New Delhi: Abhinav Prakashan.

Shapiro, Michael C. 1989. A primer of modern standard Hindi. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishing House.

Singh, Premshankar. 2016. Kanauji. In Ganesh Devy & Badri Narayana (eds.), Languages of Uttar Pradesh, 258–263 (People’s Linguistic Survey of India Volume 29, Part 1). Hyderabad: Orient Blackswan.

Tripathi, Suresh Chandra. 1977. Kannauji lok sahitya mein samaj ka pratibimb [Reflection of society in Kanauji folk literature]. New Delhi: Rupayan Publication.

Trivedi, Govind M. 1990. Echo Formation. In Shree Krishna (ed.), Linguistic traits across language boundaries, 51–81. Kolkata: Ministry of Human Resource Development.

Verma, Dhirendra. 1933. Hindi bhasha ka itihas [History of the Hindi language]. Allahabad: Khariboli Academy.